GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Barnes vs Heyhoe Flint

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BarnesWinner
90.3

Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Heyhoe Flint
90.2

Heyhoe Flint wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/sydney-barnes-vs-rachael-heyhoe-flint

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Sydney Barnes
90.3

Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. 189 Test wickets at 16.43, the best average of any bowler with 150-plus wickets.

1. Sydney Barnes
90.3
2. Rachael Heyhoe Flint
90.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Rachael Heyhoe Flint5 years played · career day 1,826168 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Sydney Barnes5 years played · career day 4,381100 runs
-40.5% vs Heyhoe Flint at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnes0000049
🇬🇧 Heyhoe Flint002048122392

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBarnesRetiredHeyhoe FlintRetired
Test wickets189
Test bowling average16.43
Five-wicket hauls24
Tests played2722
Best innings figures9
World Cup titles1
Test runs1,594
Test average45.54
Tests as captain without defeat12
Dominance w25%9488
Peak w20%9694
Longevity w20%8288
Honours w20%8490
Statistics w15%9692

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Barnes90.3
Heyhoe Flint90.2
The people
Barnes
Heyhoe Flint

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Barnes vs Heyhoe Flint. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →