Who is better, Barnes or Richards?
Sydney Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 90.2 for Viv Richards — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sydney Barnes above Viv Richards: 90.3 vs 90.2. Sydney Barnes leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Viv Richards leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Richards wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/sydney-barnes-vs-viv-richards
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 |
| 🏴 Richards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 316 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BarnesRetired | RichardsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 189 | — |
| Test bowling average | 16.43 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 24 | — |
| Tests played | 27 | — |
| Best innings figures | 9 | — |
| Test runs | — | 8,540 |
| Test centuries | — | 24 |
| World Cups | — | 2 |
| Test average | — | 50.23 |
| ODI runs | — | 6,721 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Century | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 90 |
Sydney Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 90.2 for Viv Richards — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richards scores higher on honours, longevity. Barnes leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barnes: 90.3, Richards: 90.2.
Make your case for Barnes vs Richards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.