AthletesTeams
Cooper vs DeBernardi
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CooperWinner
83.4Cooper wins: Dominance, Longevity
DeBernardi
83.2DeBernardi wins: Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/tarzan-cooper-vs-forrest-debernardi
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Charles Cooper
83.4
Cooper leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Charles Cooper
2. Forrest DeBernardi
Category breakdown
Season form · Points per game
Career timeline · Points per game
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Points per game1. 🇺🇸 Charles Cooper5 seasons played · career day 1,825404 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Forrest DeBernardi5 seasons played · career day 1,826353 points per game
-12.6% vs Cooper at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cooper | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 404 | 766 |
| 🇺🇸 DeBernardi | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 267 | 691 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CooperRetired | DeBernardiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Professional Tournament titles | 1 | — |
| Rens win streak in 1932-33 | 88 | — |
| Hall of Fame induction | 1,977 | — |
| Seasons with the Rens | 11 | — |
| Years at the top level | 17 | — |
| AAU All-American selections | — | 5 |
| AAU national titles | — | 3 |
| College All-America honours | — | 2 |
| Seasons at national level | — | 12 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cooper83.4
DeBernardi83.2
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cooper vs DeBernardi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.