GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bowley vs Wyatt-Hodge

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BowleyWinner
83.7

Bowley wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Wyatt-Hodge
83.7

Wyatt-Hodge wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ted-bowley-vs-danni-wyatt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Ted Bowley
83.7

Bowley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Sussex opener who scored 28,378 first-class runs.

1. Ted Bowley
83.7
2. Danni Wyatt-Hodge
83.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Ted Bowley5 years played · career day 1,826265 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Danni Wyatt-Hodge5 years played · career day 1,825144 runs
-45.7% vs Bowley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bowley004594204549
🇬🇧 Wyatt-Hodge001842144326

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBowleyRetiredWyatt-HodgeActive
First-class runs28,378
First-class centuries52
Highest score283
Tests played5
Seasons played21
T20 World Cup titles1
T20I runs3,000
T20I centuries2
ODI runs1,500
International seasons15
Dominance w25%7876
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%9086
Honours w20%7482
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bowley83.7
Wyatt-Hodge83.7
The people
Bowley
Wyatt-Hodge

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bowley vs Wyatt-Hodge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →