GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Dexter vs Alleyne

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AlleyneWinner
81.6

Alleyne wins: Longevity, Statistics

Dexter
81.2

Dexter wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ted-dexter-vs-mark-alleyne

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Mark Alleyne
81.6

Alleyne leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Captained Gloucestershire to six one-day trophies between 1999 and 2004.

1. Mark Alleyne
81.6
2. Ted Dexter
81.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Mark Alleyne5 years played · career day 1,8252,950 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ted Dexter5 years played · career day 1,825312 runs
-89.4% vs Alleyne at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Dexter004091312623
🇬🇧 Alleyne002006502,9506,870

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDexterRetiredAlleyneRetired
Test runs4,502
Test centuries9
Tests as captain30
Test wickets66
Tests played62
First-class runs14,498
First-class wickets431
One-day trophies as captain6
First-class centuries22
Career years20
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%7490
Honours w20%7876
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Alleyne81.6
Dexter81.2
The people
Dexter
Alleyne

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Dexter vs Alleyne. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →