GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Schroeder vs Goolagong

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SchroederWinner
83.1

Schroeder wins: Peak

Goolagong
83.1

Goolagong wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/ted-schroeder-vs-evonne-goolagong

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ted Schroeder
83.1

Schroeder leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon champion in 1949 and a five-time Davis Cup winner.

1. Ted Schroeder
83.1
2. Evonne Goolagong Cawley
83.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Ted Schroeder5 seasons played · career day 1,825252 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Evonne Goolagong Cawley5 seasons played · career day 2,55642 titles
-83.3% vs Schroeder at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Schroeder003578252590
🇦🇺 Goolagong00001158

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSchroederRetiredGoolagongRetired
Major singles titles2
Davis Cup titles5
Wimbledon titles12
US Championships1
Davis Cup singles wins13
Grand Slam singles titles7
Australian Open titles4
Career titles86
Grand Slam finals18
Fed Cups3
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%7882
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8282

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Schroeder83.1
Goolagong83.1
The people
Schroeder
Goolagong

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Schroeder vs Goolagong. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →