GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Alderman vs Mushtaq

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MushtaqWinner
85.8

Mushtaq wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Alderman
85.7

Alderman wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/terry-alderman-vs-mushtaq-ahmed

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Mushtaq Ahmed
85.8

Mushtaq leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Leg-spinner in Pakistan's 1992 World Cup-winning side.

1. Mushtaq Ahmed
85.8
2. Terry Alderman
85.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Mushtaq Ahmed5 years played · career day 1,825286 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Terry Alderman5 years played · career day 1,825280 runs
-2.1% vs Mushtaq at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Alderman004088280635
🇵🇰 Mushtaq004596286626

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAldermanRetiredMushtaqRetired
Test wickets170185
Wickets in the 1981 Ashes42
Wickets in the 1989 Ashes41
First-class wickets9561,407
Five-wicket hauls14
World Cup titles1
One-day international wickets161
Ten-wicket Test matches3
Dominance w25%8480
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%8286
Honours w20%8084
Statistics w15%9092

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mushtaq85.8
Alderman85.7
The people
Alderman
Mushtaq

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Alderman vs Mushtaq. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →