GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sjögran vs Fitschen

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SjögranWinner
85.8

Sjögran wins: Longevity, Statistics

Fitschen
85.7

Fitschen wins: Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/therese-sjogran-v-vs-doris-fitschen-v

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Therese Sjögran
85.8

Sjögran leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Sweden's record cap holder with 214 appearances.

1. Therese Sjögran
85.8
2. Doris Fitschen
85.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇸🇪 Therese Sjögran5 seasons played · career day 1,825300 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Doris Fitschen5 seasons played · career day 1,825293 goals
-2.3% vs Sjögran at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Sjögran0052108300612
🇩🇪 Fitschen0050104293605

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSjögranRetiredFitschenRetired
Sweden caps214
Sweden goals26
Damallsvenskan titles5
World Cup finals1
Olympic appearances4
European Championship titles4
Germany caps144
Olympic medals1
Bundesliga titles2
World Cup appearances3
Dominance w25%8282
Peak w20%8889
Longevity w20%9284
Honours w20%8290
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sjögran85.8
Fitschen85.7
The people
Sjögran
Fitschen

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sjögran vs Fitschen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →