GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Enqvist vs Wilander

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EnqvistWinner
82.7

Enqvist wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Wilander
82.4

Wilander wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/thomas-enqvist-vs-mats-wilander

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Thomas Enqvist
82.7

Enqvist leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Australian Open finalist in 1999 and a former world number four.

1. Thomas Enqvist
82.7
2. Mats Wilander
82.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇸🇪 Thomas Enqvist5 seasons played · career day 2,191200 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Mats Wilander5 seasons played · career day 2,55619 titles
-90.5% vs Enqvist at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Enqvist000120192238
🇸🇪 Wilander0000530

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricEnqvistRetiredWilanderRetired
Grand Slam finals111
ATP titles19
Career high ranking4
Davis Cup titles1
Seasons on tour15
Grand Slam titles7
French Open titles3
Career titles33
Weeks at No. 120
Davis Cups3
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%9089
Longevity w20%8278
Honours w20%7882
Statistics w15%8884

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Enqvist82.7
Wilander82.4
The people
Enqvist
Wilander

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Enqvist vs Wilander. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →