Who is better, Tian or woxic?
Gao "Tian" Tian-Liang leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Özgür "woxic" Eker — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gao "Tian" Tian-Liang and Özgür "woxic" Eker level at 80.5. Gao "Tian" Tian-Liang leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Özgür "woxic" Eker leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tian wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
woxic wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/tian-lol-vs-woxic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tian leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Tian | 0 | 0 | 66 | 144 | 400 | 610 |
| 🇹🇷 woxic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.06 | 4.37 | 8.65 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TianActive | woxicActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| LPL titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 2 | — |
| LPL finals | 3 | — |
| Professional seasons | 8 | — |
| Top-20 player rankings | — | 1 |
| Big events won | — | 4 |
| Career rating | — | 1.09 |
| MVP medals | — | 2 |
| Seasons at tier one | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Gao "Tian" Tian-Liang leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Özgür "woxic" Eker — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
woxic scores higher on statistics, longevity. Tian leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tian: 80.5, woxic: 80.5.
Make your case for Tian vs woxic. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.