GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Creavy vs Ishikawa

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CreavyWinner
77.4

Creavy wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Ishikawa
77.4

Ishikawa wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/tom-creavy-vs-ryo-ishikawa

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tom Creavy
77.4

Creavy leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Won the 1931 PGA Championship at 20, one of its youngest champions.

1. Tom Creavy
77.4
2. Ryo Ishikawa
77.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Tom Creavy5 seasons played · career day 2,55643 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Ryo Ishikawa5 seasons played · career day 2,19111 wins
-74.4% vs Creavy at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Creavy00001385
🇯🇵 Ishikawa00011013

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCreavyRetiredIshikawaActive
PGA Championships1
Age at PGA title20
PGA Tour wins2
PGA Championship finals1
Career years13
Japan Golf Tour wins19
Japan money list titles2
Lowest round58
Presidents Cup appearances3
Professional seasons18
Dominance w25%7270
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%6882
Honours w20%7470
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Creavy77.4
Ishikawa77.4
The people
Creavy
Ishikawa

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Creavy vs Ishikawa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →