GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

McDonald vs Witten

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McDonaldWinner
83.0

McDonald wins: Dominance, Peak

Witten
82.8

Witten wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/tommy-mcdonald-vs-jason-witten

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tommy McDonald
83.0

McDonald leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. NFL champion in 1960 and a six-time Pro Bowl receiver.

1. Tommy McDonald
83.0
2. Jason Witten
82.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Jason Witten5 seasons played · career day 1,8253,983 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tommy McDonald5 seasons played · career day 1,8253,676 touchdowns
-7.7% vs Witten at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 McDonald002828853,6766,877
🇺🇸 Witten003471,3273,9837,909

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMcDonaldRetiredWittenRetired
NFL titles1
Pro Bowls6
Career receiving touchdowns84
Career receiving yards8,41013,046
Career receptions4951,228
Pro Bowl selections11
All-Pro first teams2
Seasons played17
Dominance w25%7874
Peak w20%9084
Longevity w20%8090
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
McDonald83.0
Witten82.8
The people
McDonald
Witten

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for McDonald vs Witten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →