Who is better, Canzoneri or V. Klitschko?
Tony Canzoneri leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 88.9 for Vitali Klitschko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tony Canzoneri above Vitali Klitschko: 89.0 vs 88.9. Tony Canzoneri leads on Longevity. Vitali Klitschko leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Canzoneri wins: Longevity
V. Klitschko wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/tony-canzoneri-vs-vitali-klitschko
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Canzoneri leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Canzoneri | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 312 | 664 |
| 🇺🇦 V. Klitschko | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 206 | 561 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CanzoneriRetired | V. KlitschkoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles in weight classes | 3 | — |
| Professional wins | 137 | 45 |
| Professional bouts | 175 | — |
| World title fights | 22 | — |
| Knockouts | 44 | 41 |
| Title defences | — | 11 |
| Knockdowns suffered | — | 0 |
| World title reigns | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteTony Canzoneri leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 88.9 for Vitali Klitschko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
V. Klitschko scores higher on statistics. Canzoneri leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Canzoneri: 89.0, V. Klitschko: 88.9.
Make your case for Canzoneri vs V. Klitschko. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.