GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Roche vs Capriati

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RocheWinner
80.7

Roche wins: Longevity

Capriati
80.6

Capriati wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/tony-roche-vs-jennifer-capriati

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Tony Roche
80.7

Roche leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. French Open champion in 1966 and the winner of thirteen major doubles titles.

1. Tony Roche
80.7
2. Jennifer Capriati
80.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Tony Roche5 seasons played · career day 1,825323 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jennifer Capriati5 seasons played · career day 1,8259 titles
-97.2% vs Roche at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Roche0045100323667
🇺🇸 Capriati0025912

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRocheRetiredCapriatiRetired
Major singles titles1
Major singles finals5
Major doubles titles13
Davis Cup titles4
Seasons on tour17
Grand Slam singles titles3
Olympic golds1
Weeks at No. 117
WTA titles14
Australian Open titles2
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%8074
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%7882

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Roche80.7
Capriati80.6
The people
Roche
Capriati

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Roche vs Capriati. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →