Who is better, Caulkins or Klochkova?
Tracy Caulkins leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 1.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tracy Caulkins above Yana Klochkova: 89.8 vs 87.9. Tracy Caulkins leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Yana Klochkova leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Caulkins wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Klochkova wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/tracy-caulkins-vs-yana-klochkova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Caulkins leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Caulkins | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 338 | 616 |
| 🇺🇦 Klochkova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.77 | 30.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CaulkinsRetired | KlochkovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | — |
| US national titles | 48 | — |
| World Championship titles | 5 | — |
| American records set | 63 | — |
| World records set | 5 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| World records | — | 1 |
| 400m medley best (min) | — | 4.33 |
| European titles | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 90 |
Tracy Caulkins leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 1.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Klochkova scores higher on longevity. Caulkins leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Caulkins: 89.8, Klochkova: 87.9.
Make your case for Caulkins vs Klochkova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.