Who is better, Clévenot or Arakida?
Yuko Arakida leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Trévor Clévenot — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yuko Arakida above Trévor Clévenot: 81.6 vs 81.5. Yuko Arakida leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Trévor Clévenot leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Arakida wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Clévenot wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/trevor-clevenot-vs-yuko-arakida
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Arakida leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Clévenot | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 268 | 688 |
| 🇯🇵 Arakida | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 40 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ClévenotActive | ArakidaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World League titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| World Cup medals | — | 1 |
| Japan caps | — | 120 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Yuko Arakida leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Trévor Clévenot — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Clévenot scores higher on longevity. Arakida leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Clévenot: 81.5, Arakida: 81.6.
Make your case for Clévenot vs Arakida. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.