GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Speaker vs Yastrzemski

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SpeakerWinner
88.4

Speaker wins: Dominance, Statistics

Yastrzemski
87.4

Yastrzemski wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Baseball

Shareable URL · /compare/tris-speaker-vs-carl-yastrzemski

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tris Speaker
88.4

Speaker leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. The all-time doubles leader with 792 and a .345 career average.

1. Tris Speaker
88.4
2. Carl Yastrzemski
87.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Home runs per season

Career timeline · Home runs per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Home runs per season
1. 🇺🇸 Tris Speaker5 seasons played · career day 2,5561.7 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Carl Yastrzemski5 seasons played · career day 1,8251.5 home runs
-11.8% vs Speaker at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Speaker00000.9832.389
🇺🇸 Yastrzemski000.2660.5621.4842.644

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSpeakerRetiredYastrzemskiRetired
Career hits3,5143,419
Career doubles792
Batting average0.345
World Series titles3
League MVP awards11
Triple Crowns1
Home runs452
All-Star selections18
Dominance w25%8680
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%9094
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Speaker88.4
Yastrzemski87.4
The people
Speaker
Yastrzemski

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Speaker vs Yastrzemski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →