Who is better, Nedomanský or Fetisov?
Václav Nedomanský leads with a GOAT score of 88.9 against 88.9 for Vyacheslav Fetisov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Václav Nedomanský and Vyacheslav Fetisov level at 88.9. Václav Nedomanský leads on Statistics. Vyacheslav Fetisov leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nedomanský wins: Statistics
Fetisov wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/vaclav-nedomansky-vs-vyacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nedomanský leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Nedomanský | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 296 | 614 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 195 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NedomanskýRetired | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 3 | — |
| Czechoslovak league goals | 369 | — |
| NHL points | 278 | — |
| WHA points | 316 | — |
| Seasons played | 21 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 7 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Best defenceman awards | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Václav Nedomanský leads with a GOAT score of 88.9 against 88.9 for Vyacheslav Fetisov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fetisov scores higher on dominance, honours. Nedomanský leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nedomanský: 88.9, Fetisov: 88.9.
Make your case for Nedomanský vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.