Who is better, Wade or Kafelnikov?
Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Virginia Wade — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yevgeny Kafelnikov above Virginia Wade: 83.0 vs 82.9. Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Virginia Wade leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kafelnikov wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Wade wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/virginia-wade-vs-yevgeny-kafelnikov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kafelnikov leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Wade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 🇷🇺 Kafelnikov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 260 | 682 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WadeRetired | KafelnikovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 3 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 4 | — |
| WTA singles titles | 55 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 4 | — |
| Career match wins | 839 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 4 |
| Career singles titles | — | 26 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Virginia Wade — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wade scores higher on longevity. Kafelnikov leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wade: 82.9, Kafelnikov: 83.0.
Make your case for Wade vs Kafelnikov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.