GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Liuzzi vs Kvyat

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LiuzziWinner
68.2

Liuzzi wins: Longevity, Honours

Kvyat
67.9

Kvyat wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Formula 1

Shareable URL · /compare/vitantonio-liuzzi-vs-daniil-kvyat

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Vitantonio Liuzzi
68.2

Liuzzi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Formula 3000 champion in 2004 who scored points for Toro Rosso and Force India.

1. Vitantonio Liuzzi
68.2
2. Daniil Kvyat
67.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Race wins per season

Career timeline · Race wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Race wins per season
1. 🇷🇺 Daniil Kvyat5 seasons played · career day 1,825133 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Vitantonio Liuzzi5 seasons played · career day 1,82511 race wins
-91.7% vs Kvyat at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Liuzzi00161123
🇷🇺 Kvyat008103133202

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLiuzziRetiredKvyatRetired
Grands Prix entered80
Career points26202
Formula 3000 titles1
Best race finish6
Seasons in Formula 16
Podiums3
Grand Prix starts110
Best championship finish7
Seasons contested6
Dominance w25%5860
Peak w20%7684
Longevity w20%7468
Honours w20%6054
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Liuzzi68.2
Kvyat67.9
The people
Liuzzi
Kvyat

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Liuzzi vs Kvyat. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →