Who is better, Bukhov or Apple?
Vladyslav Bukhov leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.1 for Zach Apple — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Vladyslav Bukhov above Zach Apple: 74.9 vs 74.1. Vladyslav Bukhov leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours. Zach Apple leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bukhov wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Apple wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/vladyslav-bukhov-vs-zach-apple
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bukhov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 Bukhov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 367 | 633 |
| 🇺🇸 Apple | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 30 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BukhovActive | AppleRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 1 | — |
| Short course world medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Personal best 50 m free (s) | 21.29 | — |
| Ukrainian records | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 3 |
| Olympic Games appearances | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 5 |
| Relay world records | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Vladyslav Bukhov leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.1 for Zach Apple — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Apple scores higher on peak, statistics. Bukhov leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bukhov: 74.9, Apple: 74.1.
Make your case for Bukhov vs Apple. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.