AthletesTeams
Hammond vs Fitzsimmons
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Cross-sport verdictgoatrank.world
HammondWinner
90.3Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Fitzsimmons
88.0Fitzsimmons wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/wally-hammond-vs-bob-fitzsimmons
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Cross-sport GOAT score
🇬🇧 Wally Hammond
87.4
93.0 in-sport × 0.94 Global participation & competition depth
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Wally Hammonddepth ×0.94
2. Bob Fitzsimmonsdepth ×0.96
Category breakdown
Season form · season output
Career timeline · season output
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · season output1. 🇬🇧 Wally Hammond5 seasons played · career day 4,382340 output
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Bob Fitzsimmons5 seasons played · career day 4,38219 output
-94.4% vs Hammond at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
| 🇬🇧 Fitzsimmons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HammondRetired | FitzsimmonsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 88 |
| Test runs | 7,249 | — |
| Test batting average | 58.45 | — |
| First-class centuries | 167 | — |
| Test centuries | 22 | — |
| Test wickets | 83 | — |
| World titles in divisions | — | 3 |
| Professional wins | — | 68 |
| Career knockouts | — | 59 |
| Professional bouts | — | 92 |
| Career span in years | — | 31 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hammond90.3
Fitzsimmons88.0
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hammond vs Fitzsimmons. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.