GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Kiesling vs Green

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KieslingWinner
84.2

Kiesling wins: Longevity, Honours

Green
84.2

Green wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/walt-kiesling-vs-aj-green

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Walt Kiesling
84.2

Kiesling leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. All-Pro guard who won the 1936 NFL title with Green Bay.

1. Walt Kiesling
84.2
2. A.J. Green
84.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 A.J. Green5 seasons played · career day 1,8256,171 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Walt Kiesling5 seasons played · career day 1,825304 touchdowns
-95.1% vs Green at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Kiesling0050105304644
🇺🇸 Green001,0572,4076,1718,907

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricKieslingRetiredGreenRetired
NFL titles1
All-Pro selections2
Seasons played13
Games played132
Teams played for5
Pro Bowls7
Career receiving yards10,514
1,000-yard seasons6
Career receptions727
Receiving touchdowns70
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%8480
Honours w20%8680
Statistics w15%8492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Kiesling84.2
Green84.2
The people
Kiesling
Green

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Kiesling vs Green. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →