GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Brearley vs Curran

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BrearleyWinner
82.6

Brearley wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Curran
82.4

Curran wins: Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/walter-brearley-vs-sam-curran

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Walter Brearley
82.6

Brearley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Took 990 first-class wickets and 17 in a match twice.

1. Walter Brearley
82.6
2. Sam Curran
82.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Walter Brearley5 years played · career day 1,825323 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Sam Curran5 years played · career day 1,825296 runs
-8.4% vs Brearley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Brearley0045100323675
🇬🇧 Curran004597296651

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBrearleyRetiredCurranActive
First-class wickets990
Wickets in one match17
Test wickets1747
Seasons with 100 wickets5
County championships won2
Twenty20 World Cup titles1
Player of the Tournament awards1
Twenty20 international wickets60
Test runs815
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%7874
Honours w20%7684
Statistics w15%9286

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Brearley82.6
Curran82.4
The people
Brearley
Curran

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Brearley vs Curran. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →