GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wang vs Ovtcharov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WangWinner
79.1

Wang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Ovtcharov
72.5

Ovtcharov wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/wang-chuqin-vs-ovtcharov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang Chuqin
79.1

Wang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic mixed doubles and team champion and world No. 1.

1. Wang Chuqin
79.1
2. Dimitrij Ovtcharov
72.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇪 Dimitrij Ovtcharov5 seasons played · career day 3,65222 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Chuqin5 seasons played · career day 2,55617 titles
-22.7% vs Ovtcharov at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Wang0000528
🇩🇪 Ovtcharov0000016

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWangActiveOvtcharovActive
Olympic golds2
World Championship golds4
World No. 1 ranking1
World Tour/WTT titles20
World team titles2
Olympic medals4
European Championship singles titles2
World Cup titles1
European team titles6
Months at No. 16
ITTF Tour titles16
Dominance w25%8466
Peak w20%9076
Longevity w20%5682
Honours w20%8068
Statistics w15%8672

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wang79.1
Ovtcharov72.5
The people
Wang
Ovtcharov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wang vs Ovtcharov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →