GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wang Liqin vs Persson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Wang LiqinWinner
79.2

Wang Liqin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Persson
77.0

Persson wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/wang-liqin-vs-jorgen-persson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang Liqin
79.2

Wang Liqin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Three world singles titles and 25 months as world No. 1.

1. Wang Liqin
79.2
2. Jörgen Persson
77.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Wang Liqin5 seasons played · career day 3,65125 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Jörgen Persson5 seasons played · career day 3,28623 titles
-8.0% vs Wang Liqin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Wang Liqin0000020
🇸🇪 Persson0000323

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWang LiqinRetiredPerssonRetired
World Championship singles titles31
World Cup titles11
Olympic golds1
World team titles74
Months at No. 125
ITTF Tour titles21
European Championship titles3
Olympic appearances7
Years at top level29
Dominance w25%7870
Peak w20%8280
Longevity w20%7888
Honours w20%8074
Statistics w15%7874

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wang Liqin79.2
Persson77.0
The people
Wang Liqin
Persson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wang Liqin vs Persson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →