GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wang Nan vs Hirano

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HiranoWinner
81.4

Hirano wins: Peak, Statistics

Wang Nan
80.8

Wang Nan wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/wang-nan-vs-miu-hirano

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Miu Hirano
81.4

Hirano leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Asian champion in 2017 after beating three Chinese stars in a row.

1. Miu Hirano
81.4
2. Wang Nan
80.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Miu Hirano5 seasons played · career day 2,55559 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Nan5 seasons played · career day 2,55635 titles
-40.7% vs Hirano at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Wang Nan00002049
🇯🇵 Hirano00004382

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWang NanRetiredHiranoActive
Olympic golds4
World Championship titles15
World Cup singles titles4
World team titles6
Months at No. 166
ITTF Tour titles30
Asian Championship golds1
World Cup titles1
Olympic medals1
World Championship medals3
Career-high world ranking5
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%8490
Longevity w20%7676
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8082

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hirano81.4
Wang Nan80.8
The people
Wang Nan
Hirano

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wang Nan vs Hirano. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →