GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wang Nan vs Wang Liqin

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Wang NanWinner
80.8

Wang Nan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Wang Liqin
79.2

Wang Liqin wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/wang-nan-vs-wang-liqin

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang Nan
80.8

Wang Nan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. 24 world and Olympic titles across singles, doubles and team events.

1. Wang Nan
80.8
2. Wang Liqin
79.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Wang Nan5 seasons played · career day 2,55635 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Liqin5 seasons played · career day 3,65125 titles
-28.6% vs Wang Nan at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Wang Nan00002049
🇨🇳 Wang Liqin0000020

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWang NanRetiredWang LiqinRetired
Olympic golds41
World Championship titles15
World Cup singles titles4
World team titles67
Months at No. 16625
ITTF Tour titles3021
World Championship singles titles3
World Cup titles1
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%8482
Longevity w20%7678
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8078

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wang Nan80.8
Wang Liqin79.2
The people
Wang Nan
Wang Liqin

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wang Nan vs Wang Liqin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →