Who is better, Akram or Yuvraj?
Yuvraj Singh leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Wasim Akram — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Akram vs Yuvraj
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yuvraj Singh above Wasim Akram: 87.5 vs 87.4. Yuvraj Singh leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Wasim Akram leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
YuvrajWinner
87.5Yuvraj wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Akram
87.4Akram wins: Dominance, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/wasim-akram-vs-yuvraj-singh
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 Yuvraj Singh
87.5
Yuvraj leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Yuvraj Singh
2. Wasim Akram
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇰 Wasim Akram5 years played · career day 2,556257 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Yuvraj Singh5 years played · career day 2,191202 runs
-21.4% vs Akram at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Akram | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 393 |
| 🇮🇳 Yuvraj | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 108 | 342 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Yuvraj87.5
Akram87.4
FAQ
Where does Akram beat Yuvraj?
Akram scores higher on dominance, longevity. Yuvraj leads on peak, honours, statistics.
How is the Akram vs Yuvraj score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Akram: 87.4, Yuvraj: 87.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Akram vs Yuvraj. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.