GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Renshaw vs Lowe

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RenshawWinner
82.4

Renshaw wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Lowe
82.4

Lowe wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/william-renshaw-vs-gordon-lowe

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 William Renshaw
82.4

Renshaw leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won seven Wimbledon singles titles, six of them consecutively.

1. William Renshaw
82.4
2. Gordon Lowe
82.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇬🇧 William Renshaw5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Gordon Lowe5 seasons played · career day 1,825303 titles
-19.8% vs Renshaw at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Renshaw0055120282660
🇬🇧 Lowe0050105303640

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRenshawRetiredLoweRetired
Wimbledon singles titles7
Consecutive Wimbledon titles6
Wimbledon doubles titles5
Major finals8
Seasons on tour10
Grand Slam singles titles1
Davis Cup ties14
Seasons played23
National titles2
World top-ten rankings3
Dominance w25%8876
Peak w20%9486
Longevity w20%6288
Honours w20%8680
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Renshaw82.4
Lowe82.4
The people
Renshaw
Lowe

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Renshaw vs Lowe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →