GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Renshaw vs Kuznetsova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RenshawWinner
82.4

Renshaw wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Kuznetsova
82.3

Kuznetsova wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/william-renshaw-vs-svetlana-kuznetsova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 William Renshaw
82.4

Renshaw leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won seven Wimbledon singles titles, six of them consecutively.

1. William Renshaw
82.4
2. Svetlana Kuznetsova
82.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇬🇧 William Renshaw5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Svetlana Kuznetsova5 seasons played · career day 2,92110 titles
-97.4% vs Renshaw at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Renshaw0055120282660
🇷🇺 Kuznetsova0000111

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRenshawRetiredKuznetsovaRetired
Wimbledon singles titles7
Consecutive Wimbledon titles6
Wimbledon doubles titles5
Major finals8
Seasons on tour10
Grand Slam singles titles2
WTA titles18
Fed Cup titles3
Career-high ranking2
Career match wins700
Dominance w25%8874
Peak w20%9484
Longevity w20%6292
Honours w20%8680
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Renshaw82.4
Kuznetsova82.3
The people
Renshaw
Kuznetsova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Renshaw vs Kuznetsova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →