GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Allison vs Järryd

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AllisonWinner
84.6

Allison wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Järryd
84.5

Järryd wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/wilmer-allison-vs-anders-jarryd

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Wilmer Allison
84.6

Allison leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. US champion in 1935 and a Wimbledon finalist in 1930.

1. Wilmer Allison
84.6
2. Anders Järryd
84.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Wilmer Allison5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Anders Järryd5 seasons played · career day 2,55630 titles
-90.2% vs Allison at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Allison0050106307653
🇸🇪 Järryd0000941

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAllisonRetiredJärrydRetired
Grand Slam singles titles1
Grand Slam doubles titles38
Davis Cup ties16
Wimbledon finals1
Seasons played12
Davis Cup titles5
ATP doubles titles59
Singles career-high ranking5
ATP singles titles8
Dominance w25%8278
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8086
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Allison84.6
Järryd84.5
The people
Allison
Järryd

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Allison vs Järryd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →