GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Xu vs Vacenovská

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
XuWinner
76.8

Xu wins: Dominance, Peak

Vacenovská
76.8

Vacenovská wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/xu-yingying-tt-vs-iveta-vacenovska-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Xu Yingying
76.8

Xu leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. ITTF Pro Tour winner and Chinese Super League champion.

1. Xu Yingying
76.8
2. Iveta Vacenovská
76.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Xu Yingying5 seasons played · career day 1,825306 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇿 Iveta Vacenovská5 seasons played · career day 1,826257 titles
-16.0% vs Xu at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Xu0048103306627
🇨🇿 Vacenovská004492198527

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricXuRetiredVacenovskáRetired
ITTF Pro Tour titles2
Chinese Super League titles2
National medals3
Career world ranking best1214
International appearances60
European Championship medals2
Olympic appearances3
ITTF World Tour medals3
National titles10
Dominance w25%7470
Peak w20%8380
Longevity w20%7684
Honours w20%7474
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Xu76.8
Vacenovská76.8
The people
Xu
Vacenovská

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Xu vs Vacenovská. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →