GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Yang vs Falck

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
YangWinner
81.5

Yang wins: Dominance, Honours

Falck
81.5

Falck wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/yang-ying-tt-vs-mattias-falck

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Yang Ying
81.5

Yang leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship doubles champion and an ITTF Pro Tour Grand Finals winner.

1. Yang Ying
81.5
2. Mattias Falck
81.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇸🇪 Mattias Falck5 seasons played · career day 3,287405 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Yang Ying5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 titles
-19.5% vs Falck at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Yang0052111326657
🇸🇪 Falck00000405

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricYangRetiredFalckActive
World Championship titles2
World Cup team titles1
ITTF Pro Tour titles6
Career world ranking best3
Asian medals3
World Championship medals2
European Championship medals4
World Tour titles2
Career highest world ranking5
Olympic Games2
Dominance w25%8076
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%7682
Honours w20%8278
Statistics w15%8286

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Yang81.5
Falck81.5
The people
Yang
Falck

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Yang vs Falck. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →