Who is better, Agnel or Ndoye-Brouard?
Yohann Ndoye-Brouard leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Yannick Agnel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yohann Ndoye-Brouard above Yannick Agnel: 83.2 vs 83.1. Yohann Ndoye-Brouard leads on Longevity, Statistics. Yannick Agnel leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ndoye-Brouard wins: Longevity, Statistics
Agnel wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/yannick-agnel-vs-yohann-ndoye-brouard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ndoye-Brouard leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Agnel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 32 |
| 🇫🇷 Ndoye-Brouard | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AgnelRetired | Ndoye-BrouardActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | 1 |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| European titles | 7 | 1 |
| 200m personal best | 1.43 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| French titles | — | 10 |
| National records set | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Yohann Ndoye-Brouard leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Yannick Agnel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Agnel scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Ndoye-Brouard leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Agnel: 83.1, Ndoye-Brouard: 83.2.
Make your case for Agnel vs Ndoye-Brouard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.