GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chulak vs Carneiro

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChulakWinner
83.0

Chulak wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Carneiro
82.8

Carneiro wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Volleyball

Shareable URL · /compare/yefim-chulak-vs-macris-carneiro

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇦 Yefim Chulak
83.0

Chulak leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic champion with the Soviet Union in Tokyo in 1964.

1. Yefim Chulak
83.0
2. Macris Carneiro
82.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇦 Yefim Chulak5 seasons played · career day 1,826371 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Macris Carneiro5 seasons played · career day 2,92130 titles
-91.9% vs Chulak at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇦 Chulak0055120278636
🇧🇷 Carneiro0000937

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChulakRetiredCarneiroActive
Olympic gold medals1
World Championship medals1
European titles2
Soviet league titles3
National team years9
Olympic medals1
Grand Prix titles3
Nations League medals2
Club world titles1
Brazil caps250
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%7484
Honours w20%8880
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chulak83.0
Carneiro82.8
The people
Chulak
Carneiro

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chulak vs Carneiro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →