GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Younis vs Heyhoe Flint

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Heyhoe FlintWinner
90.2

Heyhoe Flint wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Younis
90.0

Younis wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/younis-khan-vs-rachael-heyhoe-flint

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Rachael Heyhoe Flint
90.2

Heyhoe Flint leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Captained England to the first Women's World Cup title in 1973 and never lost a Test series.

1. Rachael Heyhoe Flint
90.2
2. Younis Khan
90.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Younis Khan5 years played · career day 1,826215 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Rachael Heyhoe Flint5 years played · career day 1,826168 runs
-21.9% vs Younis at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Younis003070163438
🇬🇧 Heyhoe Flint002048122392

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricYounisRetiredHeyhoe FlintRetired
Test runs10,0991,594
Test centuries34
Test batting average52
World T20 titles1
Test matches118
World Cup titles1
Tests played22
Test average45.54
Tests as captain without defeat12
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%9288
Honours w20%8890
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Heyhoe Flint90.2
Younis90.0
The people
Younis
Heyhoe Flint

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Younis vs Heyhoe Flint. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →