GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Yuvraj vs Matthews

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MatthewsWinner
87.6

Matthews wins: Dominance, Statistics

Yuvraj
87.5

Yuvraj wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/yuvraj-singh-vs-hayley-matthews

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Hayley Matthews
87.6

Matthews leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Player of the match in the 2016 T20 World Cup final and the world's leading T20 all-rounder.

1. Hayley Matthews
87.6
2. Yuvraj Singh
87.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇮🇳 Yuvraj Singh5 years played · career day 2,191202 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Hayley Matthews5 years played · career day 1,825178 runs
-11.9% vs Yuvraj at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇳 Yuvraj00030108342
🏴 Matthews002252178400

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricYuvrajRetiredMatthewsActive
World Cup titles1
T20 World Cup titles11
ODI runs8,701
ODI wickets111
Sixes in one T20 over6
T20I runs3,000
T20I wickets120
ODI centuries6
Career best T20I ranking1
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9694
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8886
Statistics w15%9294

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Matthews87.6
Yuvraj87.5
The people
Yuvraj
Matthews

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Yuvraj vs Matthews. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →