GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Crawley vs DeFreitas

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DeFreitasWinner
79.1

DeFreitas wins: Longevity, Statistics

Crawley
78.5

Crawley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/zak-crawley-vs-phillip-defreitas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Phillip DeFreitas
79.1

DeFreitas leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. 140 Test wickets for England across a 15-year international career.

1. Phillip DeFreitas
79.1
2. Zak Crawley
78.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Zak Crawley5 years played · career day 1,825369 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Phillip DeFreitas5 years played · career day 2,19067 runs
-81.8% vs Crawley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Crawley0045106369701
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 DeFreitas0001251111

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCrawleyActiveDeFreitasRetired
Highest Test score267
Test runs3,000934
Test centuries5
Ashes hundreds1
Tests played6044
Test wickets140
ODI wickets115
First-class wickets1,221
Dominance w25%7270
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%7688
Honours w20%7268
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
DeFreitas79.1
Crawley78.5
The people
Crawley
DeFreitas

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Crawley vs DeFreitas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →