GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Zhang vs Barrowman

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ZhangWinner
85.0

Zhang wins: Longevity, Honours

Barrowman
85.0

Barrowman wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/zhang-yufei-vs-mike-barrowman

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Zhang Yufei
85.0

Zhang leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Double Olympic champion in Tokyo 2021 with an Olympic record in the 200 m butterfly.

1. Zhang Yufei
85.0
2. Mike Barrowman
85.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Mike Barrowman5 seasons played · career day 1,826373 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Zhang Yufei5 seasons played · career day 1,825346 major golds
-7.2% vs Barrowman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Zhang0052114346708
🇺🇸 Barrowman0050112274373

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricZhangActiveBarrowmanRetired
Olympic gold medals21
Olympic medals10
World Championship titles21
Asian Games golds10
Olympic records1
World records set5
Pan Pacific titles3
NCAA titles3
Dominance w25%8288
Peak w20%9296
Longevity w20%8066
Honours w20%8684
Statistics w15%8692

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Zhang85.0
Barrowman85.0
The people
Zhang
Barrowman

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Zhang vs Barrowman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →