Who is better, Hadwin or Moody?
Adam Hadwin leads with a GOAT score of 75.2 against 75.1 for Orville Moody — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hadwin vs Moody
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adam Hadwin above Orville Moody: 75.2 vs 75.1. Adam Hadwin leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics. Orville Moody leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HadwinWinner
75.2Hadwin wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Moody
75.1Moody wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/adam-hadwin-vs-orville-moody
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Adam Hadwin
75.2
Hadwin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Adam Hadwin
2. Orville Moody
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Adam Hadwin5 seasons played · career day 4,0161 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Orville Moody5 seasons played · career day 2,1911 wins
0.0% vs Hadwin at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Hadwin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 🇺🇸 Moody | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hadwin75.2
Moody75.1
FAQ
Where does Moody beat Hadwin?
Moody scores higher on peak, longevity. Hadwin leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Hadwin vs Moody score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hadwin: 75.2, Moody: 75.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hadwin vs Moody. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.