Who is better, Diaconu or Zhang Jike?
Adina Diaconu leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 77.0 for Zhang Jike — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adina Diaconu and Zhang Jike level at 77.0. Adina Diaconu leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. Zhang Jike leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Diaconu wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Zhang Jike wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/adina-diaconu-vs-zhang-jike
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Diaconu leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇴 Diaconu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 43 |
| 🇨🇳 Zhang Jike | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DiaconuActive | Zhang JikeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European team golds | 2 | — |
| European medals | 4 | — |
| World junior titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| WTT titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| World team titles | — | 4 |
| Grand Slams completed | — | 1 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 79 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 76 |
Adina Diaconu leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 77.0 for Zhang Jike — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zhang Jike scores higher on dominance, honours. Diaconu leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Diaconu: 77.0, Zhang Jike: 77.0.
Make your case for Diaconu vs Zhang Jike. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.