Who is better, Díaz or Fan?
Fan Yunwei leads with a GOAT score of 78.8 against 78.6 for Adriana Díaz — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fan Yunwei above Adriana Díaz: 78.8 vs 78.6. Fan Yunwei leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Adriana Díaz leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fan wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Díaz wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/adriana-diaz-vs-fan-yunwei-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇷 Díaz | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 342 | 708 |
| 🇨🇳 Fan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 645 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DíazActive | FanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pan American Games golds | 4 | — |
| Pan American Championship titles | 5 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 6 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 12 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| ITTF Pro Tour titles | — | 3 |
| Asian Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 6 |
| National team seasons | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Fan Yunwei leads with a GOAT score of 78.8 against 78.6 for Adriana Díaz — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Díaz scores higher on honours, longevity. Fan leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Díaz: 78.6, Fan: 78.8.
Make your case for Díaz vs Fan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.