GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Díaz vs Fan

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FanWinner
78.8

Fan wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Díaz
78.6

Díaz wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/adriana-diaz-vs-fan-yunwei-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Fan Yunwei
78.8

Fan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship doubles medallist and an ITTF Pro Tour winner for China.

1. Fan Yunwei
78.8
2. Adriana Díaz
78.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇵🇷 Adriana Díaz5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Fan Yunwei5 seasons played · career day 1,825316 titles
-7.6% vs Díaz at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇷 Díaz0050110342708
🇨🇳 Fan0050107316645

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDíazActiveFanRetired
Pan American Games golds4
Pan American Championship titles5
Career high world ranking6
Olympic Games contested3
Years at the top level12
World Championship medals2
ITTF Pro Tour titles3
Asian Championship medals2
Career world ranking best6
National team seasons8
Dominance w25%7476
Peak w20%8485
Longevity w20%7876
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%7880

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Fan78.8
Díaz78.6
The people
Díaz
Fan

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Díaz vs Fan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →