Who is better, Fukuhara or Calderano?
Ai Fukuhara leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Hugo Calderano — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ai Fukuhara above Hugo Calderano: 83.1 vs 83.0. Ai Fukuhara leads on Longevity, Statistics. Hugo Calderano leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fukuhara wins: Longevity, Statistics
Calderano wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/ai-fukuhara-vs-hugo-calderano
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fukuhara leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Fukuhara | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 155 |
| 🇧🇷 Calderano | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 324 | 670 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FukuharaRetired | CalderanoActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 1 |
| Asian Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Pan American titles | — | 6 |
| Career high world ranking | — | 3 |
| Seasons on the pro tour | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Ai Fukuhara leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Hugo Calderano — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Calderano scores higher on peak, dominance. Fukuhara leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fukuhara: 83.1, Calderano: 83.0.
Make your case for Fukuhara vs Calderano. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.