AthletesTeams
Fukuhara vs Gauzy
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FukuharaWinner
83.1Fukuhara wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Gauzy
80.8Gauzy wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/ai-fukuhara-vs-simon-gauzy-tt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Ai Fukuhara
83.1
Fukuhara leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ai Fukuhara
2. Simon Gauzy
Category breakdown
Season form · Titles per season
Career timeline · Titles per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Titles per season1. 🇫🇷 Simon Gauzy5 seasons played · career day 1,825280 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Ai Fukuhara5 seasons played · career day 3,286155 titles
-44.6% vs Gauzy at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Fukuhara | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 155 |
| 🇫🇷 Gauzy | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 280 | 580 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FukuharaRetired | GauzyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 4 | — |
| Olympic team medals | — | 1 |
| European team titles | — | 1 |
| European singles medals | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 10 |
| World Championship team medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fukuhara83.1
Gauzy80.8
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fukuhara vs Gauzy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.