GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Geiberger vs Maruyama

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GeibergerWinner
83.0

Geiberger wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours

Maruyama
83.0

Maruyama wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/al-geiberger-vs-shigeki-maruyama

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Al Geiberger
83.0

Geiberger leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Mr 59: the first player to shoot 59 on the PGA Tour, in 1977.

1. Al Geiberger
83.0
2. Shigeki Maruyama
83.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama5 seasons played · career day 2,191132 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Al Geiberger5 seasons played · career day 2,9216 wins
-95.5% vs Maruyama at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Geiberger000027
🇯🇵 Maruyama0004094174

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGeibergerRetiredMaruyamaRetired
Major titles1
PGA Tour wins113
Champions Tour wins10
Lowest round59
Ryder Cup appearances2
Japan Golf Tour wins10
Presidents Cup appearances3
Lowest competitive round58
Highest world ranking9
Dominance w25%7478
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%9086
Honours w20%7674
Statistics w15%8690

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Geiberger83.0
Maruyama83.0
The people
Geiberger
Maruyama

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Geiberger vs Maruyama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →