Who is better, Karakasevic or Chen?
Chen Szu-yu leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 78.0 for Aleksandar Karakasevic — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chen Szu-yu above Aleksandar Karakasevic: 78.1 vs 78.0. Chen Szu-yu leads on Peak, Statistics. Aleksandar Karakasevic leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chen wins: Peak, Statistics
Karakasevic wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandar-karakasevic-tt-vs-chen-szu-yu
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Karakasevic | 0 | 0 | 44 | 91 | 250 | 506 |
| 🇹🇼 Chen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 37 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KarakasevicRetired | ChenActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | 3 |
| European medals | 4 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 20 | — |
| National titles | 15 | — |
| Asian Games medals | — | 2 |
| World Tour medals | — | 5 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 15 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Chen Szu-yu leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 78.0 for Aleksandar Karakasevic — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Karakasevic scores higher on honours, longevity. Chen leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Karakasevic: 78.0, Chen: 78.1.
Make your case for Karakasevic vs Chen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.