Who is better, Karakasevic or Beregi?
Aleksandar Karakasevic leads with a GOAT score of 78.0 against 77.8 for Dora Beregi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Aleksandar Karakasevic above Dora Beregi: 78.0 vs 77.8. Aleksandar Karakasevic leads on Longevity. Dora Beregi leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Karakasevic wins: Longevity
Beregi wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandar-karakasevic-tt-vs-dora-beregi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Karakasevic leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Karakasevic | 0 | 0 | 44 | 91 | 250 | 506 |
| 🇬🇧 Beregi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 28 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KarakasevicRetired | BeregiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| European medals | 4 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 20 | — |
| National titles | 15 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| English national titles | — | 4 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 8 |
| International caps | — | 60 |
| Career span in years | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Aleksandar Karakasevic leads with a GOAT score of 78.0 against 77.8 for Dora Beregi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beregi scores higher on peak, statistics. Karakasevic leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Karakasevic: 78.0, Beregi: 77.8.
Make your case for Karakasevic vs Beregi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.