GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Karakasevic vs Qian

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KarakasevicWinner
78.0

Karakasevic wins: Longevity

Qian
78.0

Qian wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandar-karakasevic-tt-vs-qian-tianyi-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇸 Aleksandar Karakasevic
78.0

Karakasevic leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. European doubles champion and Serbia's most capped table tennis player.

1. Aleksandar Karakasevic
78.0
2. Qian Tianyi
78.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Qian Tianyi5 seasons played · career day 1,825340 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇸 Aleksandar Karakasevic5 seasons played · career day 1,825250 titles
-26.5% vs Qian at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇷🇸 Karakasevic004491250506
🇨🇳 Qian0054115340682

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricKarakasevicRetiredQianActive
European Championship titles1
Olympic appearances4
European medals4
Career world ranking best208
National titles15
World junior titles2
ITTF World Tour titles2
Chinese Super League seasons8
Asian medals1
Dominance w25%7076
Peak w20%8085
Longevity w20%9074
Honours w20%7476
Statistics w15%7880

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Karakasevic78.0
Qian78.0
The people
Karakasevic
Qian

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Karakasevic vs Qian. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →