Who is better, Čejka or Auchterlonie?
Alex Čejka leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Laurie Auchterlonie — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alex Čejka above Laurie Auchterlonie: 81.5 vs 81.4. Alex Čejka leads on Longevity. Laurie Auchterlonie leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Čejka wins: Longevity
Auchterlonie wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/alex-cejka-vs-laurie-auchterlonie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Čejka leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Čejka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 460 | 749 |
| 🇺🇸 Auchterlonie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 61 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ČejkaActive | AuchterlonieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Senior major titles | 2 | — |
| European Tour wins | 4 | — |
| Professional years | 33 | — |
| PGA Tour starts | 300 | — |
| Highest world ranking | 44 | — |
| US Open titles | — | 1 |
| First to break 80 in all four US Open rounds | — | 1 |
| US Open top-ten finishes | — | 5 |
| Career years | — | 19 |
| Winning margin in 1902 (strokes) | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Alex Čejka leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Laurie Auchterlonie — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Auchterlonie scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Čejka leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Čejka: 81.5, Auchterlonie: 81.4.
Make your case for Čejka vs Auchterlonie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.